Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
A lot of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t plan to do so.
The author suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking cigarettes, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re Vape Pen taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have a lot of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so because of other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are various reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the amount of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.